Site Meter

erectlocution ⊇ boxing jewels

4 out of 5 Strange Bedfellows Agree

Less Is…Less

I’ve been following an idea, an ideal, of simplification. I’ve been streamlining, removing the extraneous to expose the necessary. Like most folks, I dig my fair share of excess, of accumulation of things and people and prejudices and assumptions. All those things are useful to one or another degree, and anyone who claims otherwise has issues. You don’t take a broken man’s crutches until he’s done with them. But when he’s done with them, well, they’re just clutter in the hallway closet.

So, you take the crutches to Goodwill. Maybe someone else can use them. You realize that—no matter the strength of your good intentions—you’re not really going to sit and diligently pour your way over the stack of books you’ve spent not a few years and Benjamins building with the vague hope that—once you’d reached some kind of critical mass—you’d just start absorbing the material. You decide that there’s nothing wrong with the fact that there’s no fitting back into your old clothes or simple notion of right.

You decide to find your core, the fundamental engine of all that you are and do. You used to think, posit, and you used to write, so now’s the time to be getting back to that. Yes, writing. How to do that. Computers can help, but they’ve too much potential for distraction. You decide that you’ll roll your own, so to say. Boil it down. Yes, boiling things down is good. Everybody’s doing it, the boiling. So you boil down your blog design, you boil down your operating system, combing diligently, looking for all the nits. ‘With unnecessary layers of abstraction removed’, you think, ‘synapses will fire and fingertips will tap and words will appear and somewhere lightning will strike, telling the world to wake up and get ready because HE is writing again.’

Peeling Onions

Except…well, except that removing all those layers takes time, energy, fastidious investigation. You’ve got to dig through CSS and Wordpress files. You’ve got to dig through xorg.conf and your Openbox configuration files. You’ve got to solve fourth-order partial differential equations with an abacus (to get back to basics), solving, of course, for the perfect position and assembly of tools and perspective and worldview and lighting and keyboard angle and headphones and you’ve always been meaning to get into fighting shape so carpe diem mother fuckers because today it gets painful for punk bitches.

It’s one thing to clutch your crutches after their days of utility have passed. It’s quite another thing to hoist yourself up on your compulsive search for perfect crutchlessness. Because what are you afraid of? You embarked on that compulsive search to free yourself from yourself, from who it is you’ve convinced yourself to be, so you can just be. Yet, there you are, at 2:30 a.m. and your furious keystrokes aren’t filling out a NaNoWriMo entry. You aren’t putting the final touches to an alternate history novella exploring what might’ve happened if Da Vinci had made good on his flying machine. You aren’t even writing poetry. Hell, not even poetry? No, you’re stalling.

You’re afraid, not of what you don’t know, but of what you do know. See, no matter how many contrivances and distractions you array against your wits, you know what’s at your core, you know how your engine works. It would take a bigger man than you to just ride it…or would it?


8 Comments

How wonderful to have you visit again. I can imagine seeing you with shoulders and head bent and clutter rising higher as you heave to and fro, all the while tiring and sweating until you reach the bottom of the heap to see your face smiling back at you saying, ” IT COULD BE OLD OR NEW” . Then you put it all back in place and decide, what difference would it make. I love how you describe how your mind works. Sure have missed you. Thanks for showing up ! Love you

I have learned over the years that even when I have the intentions to simplify or ratify my way of life, even the intentions aren’t enough to make me comfortable in the fortress I built. The exposition that I offer to my own complacent being, doesn’t satisfy my continual roaming of finding the place, the simple world, I want to have. I have grown to become satisfied with my desires. Merely, turning my love for growth and self improvement into appreciation for my aspirations is all that I can manage today. Sometimes, I feel the opportunity to grab the anchor and allow my ship to sail slowly toward my over all goal of mental inflation. When the tide brings me forth, I try to let go and move. Until then I wait out the small storms, repairing my ship as I go. I just try to stay focused on the people in my life, and everything else will always be there.

The most frightening part of stripping away the superfluous in order to expose the core is that once the superfluous has been taken away, there’s nothing but ourselves.

Some find self discovery in mountains, others in oceans. Some find it when they achieve perfect crutchlessness.

Is it the journey or the destination?

@ Mom
The question of how much difference it makes depends on how broadly we come to it. There’s no getting around that—if you look at it broadly enough—there’s no point to any of it. There’s no point to breathing and no point to not breathing. Things move, and until the end of things always will. The trouble there is that—if that’s your only perspective, then you risk injuring people who might not share it.

@ Danielle
Similarly, if the sanest choice is to let the flow take you wherever it goes, there’s really no point in conceiving of where it is you want to be, because you simultaneously want to be everywhere and nowhere. If that’s the way of things, then so be it.

@Adrian
I’m toying with recursive application of the “is it the journey or the destination” scheme. If you allow that it’s the journey, but how you go about the journey is important, then the journey becomes a destination. You might even say that the realization and acceptance that it’s the journey is, itself, a destination.
But you hit the nail on the head: when you’ve stripped away all extraneity, you’re just left with what you are. The human animal being something less glorious than we like to presume, that can be a challenging place to be.

“If you allow that it’s the journey, but how you go about the journey is important, then the journey becomes a destination.”

Not sure about this one, it looks a little too cute. In my view, the destination is death and the journey is the progression through life.

I’m also of the “there is no point” school of thought, but tempered with a healthy dose of positive existentialism.

A French teacher taught me Camus’ The Myth Of Sisyphus at an impressionable age and it stuck. I found it rather liberating:

“This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither sterile nor futile… The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man’s heart.”

http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/00/pwillen1/lit/msysip.htm

Or as Robert Louise Stevenson put it more pragmatically, “To travel hopefully is a better thing than to arrive, and the true success is to labour.”

“Not sure about this one, it looks a little too cute. In my view, the destination is death and the journey is the progression through life.”

I can see how obvious is my attempt to be clever, but the point remains: the proselytizing of the “It’s the journey, not the destination” bit makes as its object—its destination, so to say—an understanding of how little it matters to meet the end of the path, relative to walking the path to begin with. Maybe it’s only as paradoxical as Zeno’s statement, in that it’s kind of trumped up. Yet there are those I seem to have come across who fetishize the process of emphasizing paths over their ends, and I can see how—like in anything else—that can quickly exceed the bounds of moderation. A thought experiment on recursion. You exclude yourself from this in your definition of “destination”, essentially.

I’m interested in the apparent dichotomy in the fact that—while we share, roughly, apprehension of a pointlessness—we still find ourselves excited about things which—against that pointlessness—are absurd and mundane. I’m sure that’s been explored before, but I haven’t read anything about it yet.

Well, now it’s my turn to be cute. Maybe it’s because of the pointlessness that we like the absurd and mundane? Because if there’s no point, what value has seriousness and intensity?

(Yeah, yeah, existentialism rejects a priori values, therefore what difference between serious and absurd? Told you it was too cute.)

I’m all warm and pointless inside.

Leave a Comment

Take This Blog and Shove It Nought But the Day and Time Since